Optimizing DSP Filters for Audio and Communication Applications

Practical DSP Filter Implementation with Fixed-Point ArithmeticDigital Signal Processing (DSP) filters are fundamental to many embedded systems — from audio devices and communications equipment to sensor signal conditioning and control systems. While floating-point implementations are convenient during development, many production embedded platforms (microcontrollers, DSP cores, FPGAs, and specialized ASICs) use fixed-point arithmetic because of lower cost, power consumption, and deterministic performance. This article covers practical aspects of designing, implementing, and validating DSP filters using fixed-point arithmetic, with guidance, examples, and common pitfalls.


Why fixed-point?

  • Lower cost and power: Fixed-point processors are simpler and consume less power than floating-point units.
  • Higher throughput: Fixed-point arithmetic can be faster on hardware without an FPU.
  • Deterministic behavior: Predictable execution time and bit-true results are important in real-time systems.

However, fixed-point requires explicit handling of dynamic range, quantization, and overflow — tradeoffs that must be carefully managed.


Overview: filter types and where fixed-point matters

  • FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filters:
    • Always stable.
    • Linear phase achievable.
    • Easier to implement in fixed-point because internal states are just delay lines and sums.
  • IIR (Infinite Impulse Response) filters:
    • More computationally efficient (lower order for similar specs).
    • Can be unstable if coefficients or arithmetic introduce errors.
    • Sensitive to quantization; requires careful structure choice (e.g., cascade of biquads).

Fixed-point concerns affect both filter coefficients and internal arithmetic (accumulators, multipliers, scaling).


Number formats and representations

Common fixed-point formats:

  • Q-format: Qm.n or simply Qn denotes n fractional bits (signed). Example: Q1.15 on a 16-bit signed type uses 1 sign/integer bit and 15 fractional bits.
  • Unsigned integer formats may be used for purely positive signals.
  • Block floating point (shared exponent across a vector) is an alternative when dynamic range varies.

Choose word lengths based on platform: 16-bit (Q15) and 32-bit (Q31) are most common. Keep in mind:

  • Effective fractional resolution = number of fractional bits.
  • Integer bits determine dynamic range and saturation limits.

Design flow: from floating-point prototype to fixed-point implementation

  1. Design prototype in floating-point:
    • Use MATLAB, Python (scipy.signal), or similar to get ideal coefficients and verify frequency response.
  2. Choose architecture and word lengths:
    • Decide Q-format (e.g., Q1.15 for 16-bit, Q1.31 for 32-bit).
    • Choose accumulator width (often wider than multiplier inputs to avoid overflow).
  3. Quantize coefficients:
    • Round to nearest representable fixed-point value.
    • Analyze coefficient quantization effects (frequency response deviations, stability).
  4. Choose filter structure:
    • FIR: direct-form or polyphase, symmetric implementations to halve multiplications.
    • IIR: prefer cascade of second-order sections (biquads) or lattice forms to limit sensitivity.
  5. Scale signals and stages:
    • Prevent overflow by scaling coefficients or using stage-wise scaling.
    • Use saturation arithmetic when available.
  6. Implement and test:
    • Unit tests vs floating-point reference.
    • Measure SNR, frequency response, and stability.
    • Use fixed-point simulation tools (MATLAB Fixed-Point Designer, PyFixedPoint, or custom integer-sim).
  7. Optimize for speed and memory:
    • Use hardware multiply-accumulate (MAC) instructions, circular buffers, and DMA for data movement.
  8. Validate on target hardware:
    • Real input signals, resource monitoring (CPU, memory), and timing checks.

Coefficient quantization: effects and mitigation

Quantization introduces changes in magnitude and phase response and, for IIR filters, may move poles leading to instability.

Mitigations:

  • Use higher-bit coefficients (e.g., Q31 coefficients on a 32-bit platform).
  • Use frequency-domain sensitivity analysis: compute worst-case ripple introduced by quantization.
  • Re-order sections in cascaded IIR to place higher-gain sections earlier or later depending on internal scaling.
  • Apply dithering (for some audio cases) and noise-shaping techniques in downstream processing.

Example: a floating-point coefficient b = 0.123456 becomes Q1.15 ≈ round(0.123456 * 2^15)/2^15.


Fixed-point arithmetic techniques

  • Accumulators: use wider accumulators (e.g., for 16-bit multiplies use 32-bit accumulators) to avoid overflow during summation.
  • Guard bits: reserve extra bits to prevent overflow in intermediate sums.
  • Saturation vs wrap-around: prefer saturation if available; wrap-around causes unexpected artifacts.
  • Rounding: use rounding-to-nearest rather than truncation to reduce bias. For accumulators, apply rounding before downshifting.
  • Bit shifts: use arithmetic shifts for signed numbers; track sign-extension.

Example: In Q1.15 multiply Q1.15 x Q1.15 = Q2.30; to return to Q1.15, shift right 15 bits with rounding.


FIR implementation tips

  • Symmetric FIR: exploit symmetry of coefficients in linear-phase filters to halve multiplies: y[n] = sum_{k=0}^{M} h[k]*(x[n-k] + x[n-(N-k)])
  • Use block processing (SIMD) where available.
  • Use circular buffers for delay lines to avoid memory moves.
  • For decimation/interpolation filters, use polyphase structures to reduce work.

Scaling:

  • Compute worst-case sum of absolute coefficients; ensure accumulator width handles maximum without overflow, or pre-scale coefficients so maximum sum < 1 in Q-format.

IIR implementation tips

  • Use cascaded biquads (Direct Form I or II Transposed). Transposed direct form II often offers good numerical properties in fixed-point.
  • Implement per-section scaling: after each biquad apply scaling to keep internal values within range.
  • Use state variable or lattice structures for high-order filters when numerical sensitivity is a concern.
  • Monitor pole locations after quantization; if poles move outside unit circle, redesign or increase precision.

Example: Biquad (Direct Form II Transposed) inner operations map well to MAC instructions and can be implemented with careful scaling of coefficients and states.


Dynamic range and scaling strategies

  • Input scaling: ensure input range fits chosen Q-format. For sensors, apply gain staging.
  • Stage scaling: distribute overall gain across stages to avoid saturating intermediate results.
  • Block floating point: if dynamic range varies substantially, consider block float where each block has an exponent and mantissa in fixed-point.
  • Auto-scaling: some DSP libraries/hardware offer automatic block scaling at cost of complexity.

Testing and verification

  • Compare fixed-point output to floating-point reference for:
    • Impulse and step responses.
    • Frequency response (magnitude and phase).
    • SNR and THD (for audio).
    • Worst-case inputs (maximum amplitude, DC steps).
  • Use bit-true simulation: simulate exact integer arithmetic and shifts to catch overflows and rounding errors.
  • Hardware-in-the-loop: run on target with representative signals and measure performance and correctness.

Performance and optimization

  • Use hardware MAC and DSP extensions (SIMD, packed arithmetic).
  • Align data and use DMA to reduce CPU load.
  • Minimize memory accesses: reuse buffers and apply loop unrolling where beneficial.
  • Trade precision for speed: sometimes using Q15 vs Q31 reduces memory bandwidth and increases throughput; quantify impact on SNR.
  • Consider fixed-point libraries optimized for the platform (CMSIS-DSP for Arm, vendor DSP libraries).

Practical example: Q15 FIR filter (pseudo-code)

/* 16-bit Q15 coefficients and 16-bit input, 32-bit accumulator */ for n in 0..N-1:     acc = 0  // 32-bit signed     for k in 0..M-1:         acc += (int32_t)coeff[k] * (int32_t)x[n-k]  // product is Q30     // rounding and shift to return to Q15     y[n] = (int16_t)((acc + (1<<14)) >> 15) 

Notes:

  • coeff and x are Q1.15.
  • Accumulator must be wide enough to hold sum of products (use 64-bit if M large).

Common pitfalls

  • Ignoring accumulator width and causing overflow.
  • Forgetting to apply rounding after shifts, causing bias.
  • Using direct-form high-order IIR without sectioning, leading to instability after quantization.
  • Mismatched Q-formats between stages or libraries.
  • Not testing with worst-case inputs.

Quick checklist before deployment

  • Prototype filter in floating-point and verify specs.
  • Choose Q-format and accumulator widths.
  • Quantize coefficients and simulate fixed-point behavior.
  • Select numerically robust filter structure (symmetric FIR, cascade biquads, lattice).
  • Add saturation and rounding as needed.
  • Optimize implementation for target hardware (MAC, DMA, circular buffers).
  • Validate on target with representative signals and edge cases.

Implementing DSP filters in fixed-point requires careful attention to numeric details, scaling, and structure selection. With systematic design, simulation, and testing, fixed-point filters can achieve excellent performance and accuracy on resource-constrained hardware.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *