CloudMounter Review 2025: Features, Pricing, and AlternativesCloudMounter is a macOS and Windows utility that mounts cloud storage and remote servers as local drives, letting you access files through Finder or File Explorer without syncing them to local storage. In 2025 it remains one of the most polished and user-friendly tools for bridging local workflows with cloud services. This review covers core features, platform support, performance and reliability, security and privacy, pricing, pros and cons, and popular alternatives to help you decide whether CloudMounter fits your needs.
What CloudMounter does (quick overview)
CloudMounter connects cloud accounts (Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Wasabi, etc.) and remote servers (SFTP, WebDAV, FTP) and mounts them as virtual drives. That means you can open, edit, and save files directly from your usual apps without downloading entire folders first. It’s aimed at users who want to conserve local disk space while maintaining the convenience of native file-system access.
Key short facts
- Mounts cloud storage and remote servers as local drives.
- Supports major cloud providers plus SFTP, WebDAV, FTP, and S3-compatible services.
- Available for macOS and Windows.
Supported services and integrations
CloudMounter supports a wide range of services, which typically includes:
- Google Drive (including Team Drives / Shared Drives)
- Dropbox
- Microsoft OneDrive (personal and business)
- Amazon S3 and S3-compatible storage (Backblaze B2, Wasabi, DigitalOcean Spaces)
- Box
- Yandex.Disk
- FTP, FTPS
- SFTP (SSH)
- WebDAV Support coverage can vary by version; the app’s UI lists available connectors during account setup.
Installation and user experience
Installation is straightforward on both macOS and Windows. On macOS the app requires kernel-level filesystem access (achieved via macFUSE or an equivalent driver), and on Windows it uses a background service to emulate network drives.
The UI centers on a clean list of mounted accounts and a simple “Add Cloud” flow. Adding a service usually involves:
- Selecting the provider.
- Authenticating via OAuth (for mainstream cloud services) or entering credentials for FTP/SFTP.
- Choosing mount options (read-only vs. read/write, cache settings).
Usability highlights:
- Finder and File Explorer integration feel native.
- Mount/unmount actions are quick and accessible from the app menubar/tray.
- Per-drive caching controls help balance performance vs. disk usage.
Performance and reliability
Performance depends on network quality and the remote service’s API. Typical behavior:
- Small file operations (open, save) are fast as the app streams needed data.
- Large files may require noticeable time to open/save because of transfer throughput.
- Listing extremely large directories can be slower than local folders, though CloudMounter implements directory listing pagination / on-demand fetching in many cases.
Stability:
- Generally stable for everyday workflows (editing docs, streaming media, occasional large transfers).
- Some users report occasional disconnects with flaky networks or when the host OS sleeps; re-mounting is usually quick.
Security and privacy
CloudMounter uses standard authentication flows (OAuth for mainstream providers) and stores credentials securely in the OS keychain (macOS Keychain or Windows Credential Manager). For S3 and SFTP you provide keys/passwords which are encrypted locally.
Important privacy/security notes:
- CloudMounter does not offer zero-knowledge encryption of cloud data by default. Data resides on the provider’s servers and is accessible per that provider’s policies.
- For extra privacy, pair CloudMounter with client-side encryption tools (e.g., Cryptomator or a server-side encrypted S3 bucket).
- The app supports secure protocols (SFTP, FTPS) and TLS for WebDAV/HTTP-based services.
Features that stand out (2025)
- Native mounting of Team Drives/Shared Drives for Google Workspace accounts.
- S3 compatibility and built-in support for object storage providers beyond AWS (Backblaze, Wasabi).
- Selective caching: configure per-drive cache size and behavior to balance speed and local disk usage.
- File attribute mapping so cloud metadata appears correctly in Finder/File Explorer.
- Integration with macOS Quick Look (on macOS) for previewing remote files without full download.
- Background retry/resume for interrupted transfers.
Pricing (2025)
Pricing models evolve; the common structures seen in 2025:
- Free trial with limited functionality or time-limited access.
- One-time license (single-user) or perpetual license with optional yearly upgrades.
- Subscription plans (monthly or yearly) that may include priority support and access to updates.
- Business/enterprise tiers with multi-user licensing and centralized deployment options.
Typical price ranges observed:
- Single-user perpetual license: approximately \(30–\)60.
- Annual subscription: approximately \(20–\)40 per year.
- Team/business plans: scaled per seat or site license; expect higher per-seat costs with bulk discounts.
Always check the vendor’s site for current offers or bundles (e.g., family packs, bundle discounts with other Eltima apps).
Pros and cons
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Easy, native-feeling mounts in Finder/File Explorer | Not zero-knowledge; cloud providers retain access to stored data |
Wide service support including S3-compatible providers | Performance tied to network and remote API limits |
Per-drive caching and mount options | Some advanced features behind paid tiers |
Good macOS integration (Quick Look, keychain) | Occasional disconnects on unstable networks |
Supports secure protocols (SFTP/FTPS/S3) | Requires filesystem driver (macFUSE) on macOS, which can complicate OS upgrades |
Alternatives and when to choose them
- Expandrive — Strong Windows/macOS support, robust background transfer engine; choose if you want a long-standing stable solution with broad enterprise usage. Often comparable pricing.
- Rclone (with Rclone Mount) — Highly configurable, open-source, scriptable, and free. Best for technical users who need automation and advanced cloud-to-cloud sync. Less polished GUI experience.
- Mountain Duck — From the Cyberduck team; integrates with Cyberduck bookmarks and supports many protocols. Good choice if you already use Cyberduck.
- ExpanDrive — (Often mentioned alongside Expandrive; check current naming/offerings) Similar feature set; pick based on trial experiences and UI preference.
- Native provider apps — Google Drive for Desktop, OneDrive, Dropbox offer selective sync and integration; choose if you need tight OS integration and official support, but they may sync more data locally.
- Cryptomator + Rclone — If you need client-side encryption, combine Cryptomator (encryption) with rclone mount for secure, streaming access.
When to choose CloudMounter:
- You want a simple GUI-based app that mounts multiple cloud providers as drives.
- You prefer macOS Finder or Windows Explorer access without heavy local syncing.
- You need S3-compatible object storage mounted alongside consumer clouds.
When to pick an alternative:
- You need full client-side encryption out of the box — consider Cryptomator + rclone or other zero-knowledge tools.
- You require enterprise-grade deployment and support — consider enterprise offerings from competitors or native provider solutions.
- You’re a technical user who prefers free, scriptable tools — rclone is a strong fit.
Recommendations and practical tips
- Use per-drive caching conservatively on systems with limited disk space.
- For sensitive data, add client-side encryption before storing on cloud providers.
- Test mount performance with your largest typical file types to ensure acceptable speed.
- Keep macFUSE (macOS) or equivalent drivers updated after OS upgrades to avoid compatibility issues.
- Consider a backup strategy for critical data; virtual mounts ease access but don’t replace backups.
Verdict
CloudMounter remains a solid, user-friendly tool for mounting cloud storage and remote servers as local drives in 2025. It excels at convenience and multi-provider support, with good OS integration and helpful caching options. Its main limitations are reliance on provider-side data security (no built-in zero-knowledge encryption) and performance dependence on network conditions. For most users who want easy, native access to cloud files without full synchronization, CloudMounter is a sensible choice; technical users or those needing client-side encryption may prefer rclone/ Cryptomator or enterprise-grade alternatives.